Discover how sell-side trading firms in Canada generate revenue—from underwriting fees and market making to proprietary trading and advisory services. Learn how regulatory frameworks guide capital allocation, risk management, and profitability in the Canadian marketplace.
Sell-side trading firms, such as investment banks and broker-dealers, occupy a pivotal role in Canada’s capital markets by connecting issuers with investors and facilitating the buying and selling of securities. Their services extend across a wide range of activities, and their revenue is derived from fees, spreads, and trading gains. This section explores how these firms generate income while balancing regulatory constraints, client facilitation needs, and prudent risk management.
Underwriting fees typically represent a significant revenue source for sell-side trading firms. When a company decides to issue new securities, whether stocks or bonds, an investment dealer or an investment bank serves as the underwriter, purchasing the securities from the issuer and reselling them to investors. The underwriter charges an underwriting fee, which compensates the firm for:
• The financial risk it assumes by committing to buy the newly issued securities.
• Providing strategic advice and valuation expertise.
• Coordinating legal, accounting, and other administrative tasks.
Often, large issuances are too big for a single firm to handle. In such cases, several investment dealers form an underwriting syndicate. This syndicate spreads out the risks and responsibilities of underwriting among multiple parties. Firms in the syndicate collectively commit capital to the issue and share the fees in proportion to their participation.
• This approach mitigates individual firm risk and can broaden the distribution network.
• Participants rely on each other’s networks, offering the issuer more comprehensive market coverage.
In Canada, underwriters must adhere to rules set by the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) and monitored by the Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization (CIRO). These rules include minimum capital requirements, disclosure obligations, and best practices for underwriting processes. Firms also abide by guidelines from the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) if they are part of a federally regulated financial institution.
Trading commissions are earned when sell-side firms execute trades on behalf of clients, such as retail investors, institutional investors, or pension funds. Commissions can be based on:
• The monetary value of the trade.
• The number of shares or bonds traded.
• A fixed commission schedule established by the brokerage house.
Because commissions are tied to trading volume and frequency, revenue from this stream can fluctuate significantly depending on market sentiment and volatility. During periods of economic uncertainty or market opportunity, trading volumes often rise, driving higher commissions.
Sell-side firms can earn commissions in both full-service brokerage and discount brokerage models. Full-service brokerage typically charges higher commission fees in exchange for research, advice, and personalized service. Meanwhile, online brokerage or discount brokerage platforms offer lower commission rates, focusing on trade execution with limited advice.
In recent years, some investors and institutions have shifted to fee-based models (as discussed in Chapter 25), where advisory services are offered for an annual fee based on the size of assets under management (AUM). Even so, commissions remain a key revenue source for transaction-based relationships.
Proprietary trading refers to using the firm’s own capital to trade securities, derivatives, or other financial instruments in the market. The objective is to generate profits from short-term price movements or arbitrage opportunities.
Regulatory agencies, including CIRO and OSFI, impose net capital requirements and liquidity coverage ratios (LCR) to ensure that proprietary trading does not jeopardize the overall financial stability of the firm. Additionally, proprietary trading desks operate under strict internal risk limits to mitigate market and credit risks. In Canada, dealers must maintain sufficient capital reserves to cover potential trading losses.
While proprietary trading can yield substantial profits, it also carries higher volatility. In periods of heightened market turbulence, losses can quickly accumulate if trades move in the wrong direction. Therefore, successful proprietary trading operations maintain:
• Sound risk-adjusted strategies.
• Real-time risk monitoring systems.
• Rigorous oversight by compliance and risk management teams.
Market making involves continuously quoting both a bid and an ask price for specific securities, aiming to provide liquidity to the marketplace. Market makers earn revenue from the spread—the difference between the bid (the price at which the firm is willing to buy) and the ask (the price at which the firm is willing to sell).
By acting as market makers, big investment dealers, and in some cases specialized brokerage firms, help ensure that markets remain liquid. This function is critical for investors who want to buy or sell securities quickly without causing large price swings. Market making can be particularly profitable when:
• Trading volumes are high, leading to more buy-and-sell transactions.
• Spreads are wide because of market volatility or lesser-known securities with low liquidity.
However, market makers also face risk. Maintaining an inventory of securities can lead to losses if market conditions shift unexpectedly.
The spread that a market maker earns depends on:
Advisory fees for investment banking services, such as merger and acquisition (M&A) advisory and capital-raising consultations, constitute another profitable revenue stream for sell-side firms. Canadian banks and independent investment dealers alike offer:
• Strategic reviews of potential M&A targets.
• Assistance with due diligence and valuation.
• Guidance through complex regulatory processes.
When significant corporate transactions occur—such as when a major Canadian corporation acquires an international subsidiary—sell-side firms stand to earn substantial advisory fees. The exact fee structure often comprises a retainer plus a success fee, which is typically a percentage of the total transaction value upon deal completion.
Because sell-side firms have multiple revenue sources, they must balance risk across these diverse activities. During times of high market volatility, market-making and proprietary trading can be highly profitable but also expose the firm to elevated risk. Conversely, underwriting fees and advisory fees may remain robust even when trading revenues dip, particularly if companies continue to raise capital or engage in M&A transactions.
Revenue streams can fluctuate with economic cycles:
• In bullish markets, trading volumes and underwriting activities often soar.
• In bearish or volatile markets, commission income might rise momentarily if trade volumes increase, but underwriting deals may slow, and proprietary trading may become more unpredictable.
OSFI’s liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) rules, combined with CIRO’s oversight of net capital requirements, heavily influence how much capital a firm can allocate toward proprietary trading or market-making. These frameworks help ensure that firms maintain the capacity to meet short-term obligations and protect clients’ interests.
To illustrate these concepts, consider Royal Bank of Canada (RBC), one of the largest financial institutions in the country:
Below is a simple Mermaid diagram illustrating how sell-side trading firms generate and manage their revenue streams:
flowchart LR
A[Issuers] -->|Securities Issued| B[Underwriting Fees]
B --> G[Sell-Side Firm]
C[Investors & Institutions] -->|Trade Orders| D[Trading Commissions & Market Making Spreads]
D --> G
G --> E[Proprietary Trading Profits]
G --> F[Advisory Fees]
Explanation:
• Issuers raise capital, sell-side firms earn underwriting fees (B).
• Investors and institutions place trades, creating trading commissions and market-making opportunities (D).
• The sell-side firm engages in proprietary trading, which can yield profits or losses (E).
• Advisory engagements occur in parallel for M&A and other corporate activities (F).
• Overreliance on a Single Revenue Stream: Depending too heavily on proprietary trading or underwriting can expose the firm to cyclical downturns.
• Insufficient Risk Controls: Risk management deficiencies in proprietary trading or market-making can lead to large, unexpected losses.
• Undercapitalization: Failing to meet regulatory capital and liquidity requirements can result in sanctions or reduced operational flexibility.
• Conflict of Interest: Operating simultaneously as underwriter, market maker, and proprietary trader must be managed carefully to avoid unethical or conflicting activities.
• Diversify Revenue Sources: Maintain a balanced mix of trading commissions, underwriting, advisory, and market-making revenues.
• Strong Compliance Culture: Ensure that staff are trained to abide by CIRO guidelines, CSA rules, and internal codes of ethics.
• Robust Risk Oversight: Continuously update model assumptions, set prudent risk limits, and monitor exposure in real time.
• Transparent Fee Structures: Provide clear disclosures to clients regarding fees and potential conflicts of interest.
• Canadian Pension Funds: Large pension funds (e.g., CPP Investments, Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan) typically rely on sell-side firms for trade execution in both the equity and fixed-income markets. Superior execution, made possible by these firms’ liquidity and market-making operations, can reduce overall transaction costs for the pension funds.
• Mid-Market Growth Companies: Companies planning an IPO or secondary offering often partner with regional investment dealers in underwriting syndicates to ensure broad distribution and shared underwriting risk.
• Cross-Border M&A: A Canadian company acquiring a U.S. entity might hire a sell-side firm for cross-border advisory services, exemplifying how advisory fees become a crucial revenue stream when capital market activity is booming.
Sell-side trading firms in Canada—whether specialized broker-dealers or large integrated investment banks—generate revenues from a variety of sources: underwriting fees, trading commissions, proprietary trading profits, market-making spreads, and advisory fees. Each revenue stream offers distinct advantages and risks, and their relative importance can shift with market conditions. Proper governance and strict regulatory oversight from CIRO, OSFI, and CSA help ensure that firms balance profitability with prudent risk management, thus contributing to a stable and efficient capital market ecosystem.
• CIRO Rules on Underwriting and Capital Requirements:
https://www.ciro.ca/
• Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) for banking regulation in Canada:
https://www.osfi-bsif.gc.ca/
• “The Handbook of Fixed Income Securities” by Frank J. Fabozzi for detailed insights into underwriting syndicates and bond market-making.
• Basel Committee on Banking Supervision frameworks:
Provides global standards for bank capital adequacy, stress testing, and liquidity requirements.
CSC® Vol.1 Mastery: Hardest Mock Exams & Solutions
• Dive into 6 full-length mock exams—1,500 questions in total—expertly matching the scope of CSC Exam 1.
• Experience scenario-driven case questions and in-depth solutions, surpassing standard references.
• Build confidence with step-by-step explanations designed to sharpen exam-day strategies.
CSC® Vol.2 Mastery: Hardest Mock Exams & Solutions
• Tackle 1,500 advanced questions spread across 6 rigorous mock exams (250 questions each).
• Gain real-world insight with practical tips and detailed rationales that clarify tricky concepts.
• Stay aligned with CIRO guidelines and CSI’s exam structure—this is a resource intentionally more challenging than the real exam to bolster your preparedness.
Note: While these courses are specifically crafted to align with the CSC® exams outlines, they are independently developed and not endorsed by CSI or CIRO.